Alla Yaroshinskaya

(1992, Russia)
Joint Award with John Gofman

...for revealing, against official opposition and persecution, the extent of the damaging effects of the Chernobyl disaster on local people.

About

Alla Yaroshinskaya was born in 1953 in the Zhitomir region of the Ukraine and on graduating in journalism from Kiev University worked for 13 years as a correspondent of the local newspaper. At university she was a political dissident. During her work she consistently tried to expose party corruption and suffered administrative penalties. At the end of 1986 she began to feel uneasy about the supposed evacuation of areas, which had been contaminated by radiation from the Chernobyl accident in April that year, and she began to investigate.

Contact Details

Rubliovskoe Shosse 34
Building 2, Apt. 437
Moscow
RUSSIA 121609

Biography

Yaroshinskaya discovered that people from highly contaminated villages were being settled in hardly less contaminated villages nearby; that their health problems were serious but officially denied and ignored; that their new accommodation was grossly inadequate; and that people could not survive without eating the highly radioactive food being grown in the area. Her newspaper not only refused to publish her article but commissioned another journalist to write a reassuring article about the area instead. Her piece was also refused by Pravda and Izvestia and other national papers to which she sent it. But, under the influence of glasnost, Izvestia did publish a story about how her work was being suppressed. Locally, she distributed samizdat versions of her article. Great pressure began to be put on her, but popular support for her was great. In 1989 she was nominated for election to the new Supreme Soviet of the USSR and was elected with 90% of the vote.

On the Ecology and Glasnost Committee of the Supreme Soviet, she used her position to continue her campaign for full disclosure of the Chernobyl contamination. In 1990 she was appointed to a Commission to look into the matter. That year she made a presentation on the subject to the European Parliament. In the USSR the Commission's progress was blocked by bureaucrats at every turn and even after the abortive putsch in 1991 she was not permitted to copy relevant documents. In April 1992, having made clandestine copies of top-secret documents of the Communist Party Politburo, her resultant article, "Forty secret protocols of the Kremlin wise men", was published by Izvestia and picked up by the Western press.

Yaroshinskaya is the author or co-author of a dozen books and over 700 articles in scientific magazines and the mass media. Her book on Chernobyl was published in five languages. She is also originator, editor-in-chief and co-author of the Nuclear Encyclopaedia, the first of its kind in the world, which shows the true nature of nuclear problems.

Being unpopular with the Communist authorities in her native Ukraine, Yaroshinskaya stayed in Russia after the Soviet Union broke up. In 1993, after working as Deputy to the Minister of Press and Information, she became Adviser to the Russian President, Boris Yeltsin. She has been a member of Russian delegations to the United Nations for negotiating an extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and to the UN Women's Conference (1995).

Actively engaged in political and public work on human rights, press freedom and nuclear issues, she was President of the Ecological Charity Fund, and is Co-chair of the Russian Ecological Congress, Chief of the Federal Council of the all-Russian Social Democratic Movement and a member of other international committees. In 1998 she received an international women's award as one of "100 heroines of the 20th century".

Later, Alla Yaroshinskaya was active in organising an international team of scientists, lawyers, activists and victims of Chernobyl to prepare and to pass an appeal to the European Court on Chernobyl-related crimes against humanity. She has also pushed for a Chernobyl "Nuremberg" trial against the former Soviet authorities.

Speeches

Acceptance Speech by Alla Yaroshinskaya

December 9th, 1992

Each and every life is unique.

Honourable Members of the Parliament!
Honourable Members of the Selection Committee for the Right Livelihood Award!

I am very grateful for the high honour to be awarded an International Prize and for the opportunity to speak here to this august assembly.

While doing my everyday work for the defence of the rights of ecological refugees and forced migrants, while struggling for glasnost about the consequences of the biggest man-made catastrophe in the history of mankind - the Chernobyl nuclear accident in Ukraine, I was, naturally, not thinking about any awards. Therefore, I think, I have the right to believe, and I ask you to share this right with me, that all victims of the Chernobyl accident, as well as victims of other ecological accidents on the territory of the former Soviet Union, which I have dealt with, share this great honour with me.

The very name of Jakob von Uexkull's award implies two eternal philosophical categories - Life and Man. I omit reflections about how these categories have been understood over the centuries. I shall dwell on the more timely aspect of it: how are these high concepts realized in everyday life.

"Devotion to Life"

This moral imperative was created by a true genius and a unique personage, Albert Schweitzer. I think that this idea, if compared to practice, gives the best illustration of the enormous distance between the philosophical ideal of the understanding of human being and the realization of this ideal in everyday life. I believe that I have the right to think so because I myself have been running this marathon race, the end of which is not yet in sight. I mean first of all the work for glasnost concerning the consequences of the Chernobyl accident, its global scale, and the harmful, sometimes even deadly influence of radiation on Man and Life. And what is most important is saving every human life which is fading away, often unknowing, on the radioactive plains of the former Soviet Union.

The scale of the Chernobyl accident is truly global. According to some scientists, the discharge of cesium-137 is equal to 300 Hiroshimas. A well-known Russian scientist Nikolaj Vorontsov has said: "In any case the whole globe has gone into the Chernobyl zone". Radiation has affected nearly 80 percent of the territory of Belarus. According to the information I received from my parliamentary inquiry, contaminated agricultural areas in Ukraine make up 7.229 million hectares. According to different evaluations, 6 to 8 million people live in contaminated regions. 1.5 million of those live in the most contaminated region. The official medical estimates show that "87 percent of the adult population of this region have received radioactive irradiation of the thyroid gland." 1.6 million children have been exposed to radiation doses that can cause different diseases. This severe truth was very difficult, and for a long time impossible, to find out.

The Soviet official doctrine of the secure living in the radioactive region is based on the notorious concept of "35 rems during 70 years". That means that a person may receive 35 rems during his life time and that will not affect his health, quality of life, or future generations. Experts of the former Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union, Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, including the prominent scientists, do not agree with this official concept of "acceptable victims". They hold to the "no thresh-hold of safety"-concept of radiation dose shared by many other specialists both in my country and in the West.

Official medical representatives, speaking in the Parliament, pointed out that society must evaluate the whole risk and the whole benefit of the decreased acceptable dose. Because if the specified acceptable dose is decreased, it will be necessary to resettle not tens but hundreds of thousands of people. The original conception was based not on the right of people to a decent life but on the mercantile interest of the ruling clique.

If the world community will not intervene, and this conception continues to be the basic one in the CIS, then, according to the conclusion of the UN scientific committee on nuclear radiation, 35 rems received during the life time can give us 1750 to 12100 cases of serious hereditary anomalies per 1 million new-born children of irradiated parents. If we admit that the average life time is 70 years (for 1 million new-born it makes 70 million years), the evaluation of genetic risks will give following evaluations of damage: the dose of 35 rem will give in the first generation 39,000 to 247,000 years of inferior life per 1 million new-born and 46,500 to 358,000 years of decreased life time.

All these figures are little known in the countries of the former Soviet Union. The consequences and the scale of the Chernobyl accident were kept secret by the Soviet government itself, as well as the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Defence. All my attempts to publish materials about what I had seen in the contaminated regions from the end of 1986 to the beginning of 1987, stumbled across these restrictions. Only in 1989, at the First Congress of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union, was I able to make a speech and then publicly give a videocassette about contaminated settlements personally to Michail Gorbachev.

The struggle for glasnost concerning the consequences of the nuclear accident was going on in the Committee for Ecology, in the Chernobyl Committee, and in the Governmental Expert Commission, where I happened to work. But only after the coup on August 19th, 1991 could we get top-secret documents of the operational group of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee - forty secret reports. The adduced facts and the scale of deception are striking. According to these reports, tens of thousands of people, including those with diagnosed "radiation disease", were hospitalized during the very first months following the catastrophe. In order to keep these facts from the public (human life has never been of any value in my country), the Politburo set new permissible doses, 10 to 50 times above the norm. In this miraculous way the contaminated people recovered at once and were discharged. There exists documentary evidence that in some regions no post-mortem examinations of the dead, including children, were made. Over 200,000 soldiers and officers have been exposed to radioactive irradiation.

The English philosopher John Locke once proclaimed every human being's right to "life, liberty and private property". The third president of the United States Thomas Jefferson changed this Lockean formula in the famous Declaration of Independence inserting the expression "pursuit of happiness" for "property". The UN Declaration of Human Rights (Article 3) says that "Every human being has the right to life"...

What is happening presently in the contaminated regions is the violation of all declarations of human rights. Hundreds of thousands of people are still forced to live in the contaminated regions. Nobody is resettling them. And they cannot afford to move to new places themselves: free prices and inflation have surpassed all expectations. Only today, almost six years later, has it become known that 14 regions in Russia have been contaminated. That means that adults and children have lived on the cesium contaminated lands during all these years. They ploughed and sown this land and swallowed radio nucleids. Yes, their rights to life appear to have been realized, but can it be considered a normal life? I think that in the light of the latest events, and I mean not only the resettles and forced migrants from the Chernobyl region, but also the horrible hunger in Somalia, national wars in Yugoslavia ant the former Soviet Union, everywhere else where the human right to normal life has ceased to be such, the time has come for the UN to change its third article by adding a more precise wording: "Every human being has the right" not just to "life" but to a "worthy life". I greatly value the UN and hope that it will play a more significant role in the elimination of the consequences of this planetary catastrophe - the Chernobyl accident. If the abolishment of the dangerous confrontation between the two systems - the totalitarian communist one and the democratic one only recently was the main condition for the survival of the mankind, then today, when the Soviet Union does not exist any longer, the factors become ecology as well as war and peace on the territory of the former Soviet Union. The main danger for the world community is that wars take place on a territory well endowed with nuclear power stations. The world must recognize it. First of all, politicians, but also the peoples. In this context I have a concrete proposal for discussion: to set up under the aegis of the UN an international consultative committee for ecological refugees and forced migrants, for the people who are forced to live in the radioactive zones. Such a committee must have the right to make inquiries in all governmental organizations, including IAEA. This committee must have the right to give recommendations in the framework of international law as well as to demand the implementation of these recommendations, under the jurisdiction of the International Court.

Humanitarian aid. In the name of the victims of the Chernobyl nuclear accident I want to express my deep gratitude to all countries, all governments, all nongovernmental organizations that have helped the Chernobyl population. I deeply bow to You.

Unfortunately, this aid does not always reach those to whom it is intended. Sometimes it is plundered by unconscientious people who profit on other people's sorrow. As a journalist, I have written about how money collected abroad was plundered, even for the purpose of building summer houses for the former party nomenclature. How the new rich Soviet people buy cars abroad for their own profit and import them duty-free under the pretence of the importation of baby food. This is why I believe that the time has come to think about what country will become the guarantor of the control over the distribution of the humanitarian aid to the victims of Chernobyl. As far as I know, Japan took the part of a guarantor for the distribution of the humanitarian aid to the low-income people in the CIS at the Tokyo Conference on October 29-30th, 1992. Perhaps my proposal will become the basis for your discussion and Sweden will become a guarantor of the distribution of the humanitarian aid to the victims of Chernobyl. If you make such a decision in principle, I am ready to participate in the work on such a project.

And finally, the lack of control in the spending of money, including foreign currency, in some foundations and societies who deal with the distribution of aid to the inhabitants of the Chernobyl region, has convinced me of the necessity to start my own international foundation to help ecological victims. This would be the most efficient use of the prize that I have been awarded, for the sake of the continuation of my Chernobyl mission. My friends in the West and in Japan are ready to provide me with every possible assistance. I also hope for your support and understanding of this situation in the CIS.

Human Life - unique and individual - is only a moment in the eternal universe. Humanity should never forget this. We are floating through worlds and stars in order to finally create a life which is worthy of Man.

Thank you for your attention.

  Pictures
 Videos

Interview with Alla Yaroshinskaya

From Chernobyl to the Right Livelihood Award - how did it start?

How did you feel about Chernobyl and the threat it posed for you and your family?

Will you continue to fight for the victims of Chernobyl and for the truth?

Interviews

FAQ about Alla Yaroshinskaya

(asked in 2005)

1. What is your main focus today?

Nuclear non-proliferation.

2. What does the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster in 2006 mean to you?

To look back and to look around to understand a current world situation, to try to do the work to improve people's life, to explore new ideas on the next development of the world society.

3. What do you think about the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and recent developments in this area?

The NPT does not work!
It was a big failure. The society must mobilise itself to do the step to change a situation, to disarm and to eliminate nuclear weapons. The nations need comprehensive treaties to ban nuclear weapons and step by step to eliminate them.

4. When will life be better?

When we all will try to make a difference and to act to fight for this better life. Act now!

5. What must we do for a better life?

We must act intensively, don't fear - you do right work. Remember your rights and try to defend yourself, try to change your mind and life!

6. What effect has the RLA had on your work?

Great effect! It has given and is giving me the strong impulse to work and to create and to act.

Publications

 

25 Years later. Chernobyl. Crime without Punishment. Transaction Publishers, 2001.

Chernobyl. The forbidden truth. University of Nebraska Press, 1995.
From Nucleus to Nuclear Targeting and Nuclear Proliferation.
 Download(pdf)

Consequences of Widening Income Differentials, Social Stratification and Environmental Degradation: The Situation and Perspectives in Russia. 
Download (pdf)

Contact

Right Livelihood Award Foundation

Head office:
Stockholmsvägen 23
122 62 Enskede
Sweden

Phone: +46 (0)8 70 20 340
Fax: +46 (0)8 70 20 338

Geneva office:
Maison de la Paix
Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2, Building 5
1202 Geneva
Switzerland

Phone: +41 (0)22 555 09 55

E-mail: