Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC) ist eine von jungen Menschen aus Ozeanien geführte Organisation. Für die Zukunft des Planeten und seinen Bewohner*innen brachte PISFCC die Klimakrise vor den Internationalen Gerichtshof (IGH) in Den Haag. Die Organisation wurde 2019 von 27 Jurastudierenden gegründet, die in einem Seminarraum der University of the South Pacific in Vanuatu mit ihrer Idee den Grundstein zur Kampagne legten. Für sie ist der Klimawandel keine abstrakte Bedrohung: Zyklone zerstören im Pazifik ganze Volkswirtschaften, der steigende Meeresspiegel vertreibt Familien, das Salzwasser macht Ernten unbrauchbar.

Nach fünf Jahren engagierter Arbeit in der globalen Klima-Bewegung, die die Menschenrechte ins Zentrum stellte, errang PISFCC im Juli 2025 einen historischen Erfolg. Der Internationale Gerichtshof (IGH) erklärte in einem Gutachten, dass Staaten rechtlich verpflichtet sind, Klimaschäden zu verhindern, Menschenrechte zu schützen, Wiedergutmachung zu leisten sowie gegenwärtige und zukünftige Generationen zu sichern. Diese Entscheidung gilt als Meilenstein des Völkerrechts und eröffnet weltweit neue Wege für Klimagerechtigkeit.

Zentral für die Strategie von PISFCC war, betroffene Gemeinschaften in Ozeanien selbst zu Wort kommen zu lassen – denjenigen, die am wenigsten zum Klimawandel beitragen, aber bereits deutlich von den Auswirkungen betroffen sind. Indem PISFCC diese Stimmen des Verlusts, der Widerstandskraft und Anspruch auf Gerechtigkeit vor den IGH trug, stellten sie sicher, dass sie Eingang in das Rechtsgutachten fanden.

PISFCC teilt den Right Livelihood Award 2025 mit dem Juristen und Autor Julian Aguon, dessen Rechtsteam den Fall entscheidend voranbrachte. Die partnerschaftliche Zusammenarbeit von Jugendbewegung und juristischem Ansatz zeigt, wie kollektives Handeln Systeme verändern kann.

It’s not about us. It’s about everyone who deserves that win. We row together. The alternative is unthinkable. If we stop, we lose everything.

Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change

Biographie (auf Englisch)

PISFCC is a youth-led Pacific organisation that transformed lived frontline realities into a world-shaping legal case, confronting a crisis threatening identity, sovereignty and survival.

By placing human rights at the centre of climate law, PISFCC — in partnership with allies like Julian Aguon — unlocked a new era of accountability, solidarity and hope, reshaping how the world will fight climate change.

While Others Imagine, We Live It

For those living on the frontlines of climate change, its effects are often felt long before they learn the term itself.

In the Reef Islands of the Solomon Islands, PISFCC President Cynthia Houniuhi remembers growing up surrounded by abundance: fish in the reef and fruit from the trees. Yet by the time she reached secondary school, the changes were stark.

“We would travel back to my dad’s village during holidays and the sight that would greet us went from being the most beautiful place to a place where the houses had their posts already in the water. I didn’t know the word ‘climate change’ yet, but I saw what it meant,” she said.

Across the Pacific, communities echoed these realities: coral bleaching, salinised gardens, and graves washed away. “We contribute almost nothing to emissions,” Houniuhi says, “but our whole selves, our homes, our languages, our identities are at stake.” For PISFCC’s Director Vishal Prasad, the lesson was clear: building sea walls could never be enough; only transformational change could match the scale of the crisis.

An Idea Too Big for One Classroom

Frustrated by the slow pace of global negotiations, the lack of real political will, and the refusal of powerful states to commit to a full fossil fuel phase-out — even as science warned of a closing window before 2030 — they decided to act.

The spark was ignited in a law lecture in 2019. Twenty-seven students asked, why were international regimes so unambitious? Their discussion landed on the role of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the world’s highest court, which adjudicates disputes among states.

“What could be more ambitious than asking the ICJ itself to speak?” Houniuhi recalls.

Collectively, they drafted a question that placed human rights and intergenerational equity at the centre: “What are the obligations of States under international law to protect the rights of present and future generations against the adverse effects of climate change?” This framing later shaped the resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in March 2023, which referred a version of the question to the Court: “What are the obligations of States under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment for present and future generations?” The students then together formed the youth-led organisation Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change to take the ICJ AO campaign forward.

From that classroom, they wrote letters, drafted briefs and persuaded leaders. Vanuatu became the first government to adopt their call, beginning a partnership that lasted through to the ICJ hearings. When the Covid-19 pandemic halted travel, PISFCC helped create the World’s Youth for Climate Justice (WYCJ). This organisation became the international youth arm of the campaign, building global awareness, coordinating advocacy across continents and connecting their Pacific struggle to a wider movement. They also helped convene a civil-society alliance of over 1,700 organisations.

Global collective action was much needed for the campaign to get off the ground and make it to the ICJ chambers. For the Court to consider such a request, member states of the UN General Assembly need to refer the question, requiring vast international support. Under Vanuatu’s leadership, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution by consensus in 2023 requesting the Court’s opinion clarifying international legal obligations to protect the climate system and address climate damage.

It was nothing short of David versus Goliath: young law students and one small island state forcing the world’s most powerful nations to answer for the climate crisis.

For Houniuhi, the delivery of the International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion carried the weight of countless sacrifices and the voices of all who had testified. She described it as a mixture of grief and relief, the sense of finally being heard. Prasad describes it as “the biggest push for climate justice in decades, turning hope into something tangible.”

Speaking for Our Ancestors, Our Islands, Our Future

PISFCC insisted that the law must be infused with lived experience. They annexed community testimonies from the Solomon Islands, Fiji and Tonga to state submissions, created the Witness Stand video campaign, and convened a People’s Assembly whose petition Prasad carried into the Great Hall of Justice.

When the hearings opened at the International Court of Justice, Houniuhi and Prasad both addressed the judges: the first time Pacific youth had spoken directly to the ICJ. Houniuhi delivered a six-minute opening statement in both her native language and in English, moving the Court with the power of her words. She drew inspiration from her grandmother, who had reminded her: “You see the islands — that’s ours.” Those words, she later said, gave her strength to speak not only for herself, but for generations past and future.

“The emotion came from understanding the sacrifices of so many, and from knowing their voices were in that courtroom with me,” she remembers.

Their speeches also showed something larger: that there is space in the world for campaigns that are both as profoundly ambitious as authentic, led not by performance, but by people true to themselves and their communities.

The Ruling That Turned the Tide

On 23 July 2025, the ICJ delivered its opinion. It confirmed that states have binding obligations under international law to prevent climate harm, cooperate to protect vulnerable peoples, and align their actions with the 1.5 degree Celsius goal and best available science. Crucially, it established that breaches entail consequences: cessation of harmful conduct, and full reparations, from ecosystem restoration to compensation and recognition. Although ICJ advisory opinions are not legally binding, they carry great authoritative weight as interpretations of international law.

“It’s the first time the ICJ has spoken on climate change, and it delivered one of the most progressive advisory opinions in the Court’s history,” Prasad says. “It shifts climate action from voluntary pledges to legal obligations. It gives us a tool to hold states accountable, everywhere.”

For frontline communities, the opinion is both a shield and a compass, affirming that their struggles are not charity cases but matters of right.

An Alliance that Made World History

The campaign’s strength lay in partnership. Among PISFCC’s and WYCJ’s closest allies was Chamoru lawyer and writer Julian Aguon, who shares the Award. While PISFCC mobilised youth, governments and global civil society, Aguon and his team at Blue Ocean Law advanced the legal strategy, drafting questions and defending the resolution text against attempts to weaken it.

Working in parallel, each organisation played a distinct but complementary role: campaigning created the political momentum, while legal experts safeguarded the integrity of the case.

The shared award recognises that combination: the fire of youth-led mobilisation and the rigour of legal advocacy. Together, they brought “the world’s biggest problem to the world’s highest court.”

Holding the Line: No Choice but to Keep Fighting

The opinion is not the end. “Now comes the hard part: operationalising it,” says Prasad. PISFCC is pressuring governments to align their national climate plans with the Court’s baseline, accelerate the phase-out of fossil fuels and make climate finance grant-based, so frontline communities receive support without being trapped in debt. For Pacific peoples, this means survival funding that is accessible, equitable and rooted in justice rather than loans. PISFCC is also building regional youth capacity to lead future advocacy and preparing for upcoming UN climate negotiations, insisting that talks rise above — never fall below — the ICJ’s floor.

The opinion is more than symbolic. It establishes that the 1.5 degree Celsius goal is binding and that national climate pledges, known as Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs, must be grounded in science and human rights. Prasad explains that the next five years will be critical: the decisive window in which either the world bends emissions downward or locks in catastrophe.

“For the first time, the law says states can’t just promise. They are obliged,” he said.

The journey has been exhausting. All leaders describe sleepless nights, time away from families, and the strain of carrying the weight of their communities’ expectations. Yet in the midst of this, they also graduated as lawyers, and Houniuhi has returned to the very university where the campaign began, now teaching the next generation.

“The alternative is unthinkable. If we stop, we lose everything. That’s why we keep going. It’s not about us. It’s about everyone who deserves that win. We row together.” Houniuhi and Prasad, speaking to their shared sense of collective duty.

Recognition belongs to many: classmates, communities, allies across continents. Through their and PISFCC’s shared story, the world glimpses what stubborn optimism, rigorous law and collective courage can achieve.